|
Post by jlafavor on Mar 26, 2010 21:16:15 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by jlafavor on Mar 26, 2010 21:29:12 GMT -6
I am still voting no on King, the more our league goes on, 23 ppg scorers aren't all that uncommon.
|
|
Daboy
1st Rounder
1975 ITP Champs (ITP2), 1987 ITP Champs (ITP3), 1987 GMOTY
Posts: 6,600
|
Post by Daboy on Mar 26, 2010 21:31:57 GMT -6
here is a stat why i am saying no: player of the week awards: 1.
just never really a top player in the league
|
|
|
Post by jlafavor on Mar 26, 2010 21:34:11 GMT -6
here is a stat why i am saying no: player of the week awards: 1. just never really a top player in the league Mark Aguirre (whom you voted yes) had zero.
|
|
|
Post by John1974 on Mar 26, 2010 21:35:01 GMT -6
Im still a no, reasons are posted on both prior HOF polls. He was good, but not HOF worthy.
|
|
Doogie
1st Rounder
Spurs GM...."Jusssssst a bit outside!"
Posts: 6,182
|
Post by Doogie on Mar 26, 2010 22:07:23 GMT -6
No sir
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Mar 26, 2010 22:31:06 GMT -6
I am not going to place a vote. Just in here saying if it went from 55 one year to 27 the next I believe he should just be dropped.
|
|
nyk2013
Starting player
Blazers 2000 ITP CHAMPS
Posts: 8,860
|
Post by nyk2013 on Mar 26, 2010 22:32:34 GMT -6
I voted yes becaz I thought he was a complete player.
|
|
|
Post by scarface132 on Mar 26, 2010 23:05:25 GMT -6
I am still going to vote yes. Obviously the people who came in later have the chance to be better overall with cash, camps, more tc's etc. You can't just look at overall stats vs stats, he was the main in his prime, and he was really money the first two years he went to the ITP Finals with the Jazz.
|
|
|
Post by arrestinu on Mar 26, 2010 23:06:29 GMT -6
Still at "no" on King.
|
|
|
Post by scarface132 on Mar 26, 2010 23:07:23 GMT -6
I voted yes becaz I thought he was a complete player. You did? Maybe you forgot to vote in the poll, and just responded here? Before I just voted he had no yes votes fwiw.
|
|
josh
2nd Rounder
1979 ITP Champs
Posts: 2,730
|
Post by josh on Mar 26, 2010 23:15:31 GMT -6
here is a stat why i am saying no: player of the week awards: 1. just never really a top player in the league Mark Aguirre (whom you voted yes) had zero. Hahahahahahahahahahahaha King is a yes for me still. He was instrumental in a title run and a subsequent Western Conference title, and he was the best SG in the league each of the first two seasons. Even with fewer minutes and low potential later in his career, he still posted career averages that are standing the test of time. In a league full of souped up superstars who get camped 400 times, King hung with them all even though he was NEVER CAMPED. He's a yes for me, and will be until the (inevitable) day that his name is dropped off of balloting.
|
|
|
Post by jlafavor on Mar 27, 2010 0:14:25 GMT -6
I am not going to place a vote. Just in here saying if it went from 55 one year to 27 the next I believe he should just be dropped. per the rules, 20% of the vote keeps him on the ballot. we never set a max years limit however.
|
|
ciggy20
College Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,472
|
Post by ciggy20 on Mar 27, 2010 11:14:13 GMT -6
I voted no, just don't think he is HOF worthy
|
|
|
Post by don1955 on Mar 27, 2010 13:59:12 GMT -6
a lot of good reasons given for and against, but i still say no...
|
|
|
Post by gritter13 on Mar 28, 2010 11:30:12 GMT -6
I voted no. I just don't think he was a great player.
|
|