|
Post by jlafavor on Feb 20, 2010 18:25:56 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Feb 20, 2010 18:38:49 GMT -6
I vote yes. I love his all around play. I think the last 3 years of his career really hurt his career totals. He was one of the most consistent player, even when he got older. You expected top of the line defense and very solid scoring. He also chipped in with good rebounding.
|
|
Daboy
1st Rounder
1975 ITP Champs (ITP2), 1987 ITP Champs (ITP3), 1987 GMOTY
Posts: 6,600
|
Post by Daboy on Feb 20, 2010 22:35:02 GMT -6
very good defender, good point scorer, alright rebounder. maybe i will change my vote next season, but just dosnt do it for me right now
|
|
|
Post by joshbounds on Feb 20, 2010 22:38:54 GMT -6
I vote yes, a very good player for many years here..
|
|
josh
2nd Rounder
1979 ITP Champs
Posts: 2,730
|
Post by josh on Feb 21, 2010 0:27:13 GMT -6
I dunno about Nance, so for now he's a no for me...A good defender but by no means elite, never averaged a double double and wasn't ever a viable first scoring option or a guy that could totally take over and dominate a game.
Nance goes in the hall of very good for me, not the hall of fame.
|
|
|
Post by jlafavor on Feb 21, 2010 0:38:15 GMT -6
i voted no, im not holding his last 3 years against him, i liked his overall skills, and making the defense 2nd team 4 straight years is impressive, but i am disappointed he never got first team in that time. i may change my answer in future seasons however.
|
|
|
Post by Keyser Soze on Feb 21, 2010 1:24:10 GMT -6
Nope
|
|
|
Post by don1955 on Feb 21, 2010 10:49:00 GMT -6
i vote no for now, very good but not great...
|
|
|
Post by John1974 on Feb 21, 2010 12:18:00 GMT -6
I like nance, I voted no because I dont see him as great. I only wish back in the day the deal I had for him woudnt have fallen apart because I think for awhile he wasnt used well and on the right team like those good Wolve's teams he would have been a different player.
|
|
|
Post by gritter13 on Feb 21, 2010 14:56:21 GMT -6
A no here as well for me...he was very good, but not great.
|
|
|
Post by arrestinu on Feb 21, 2010 16:15:43 GMT -6
I'm going to vote no on Nance. It looks to me like he really made a steady decline after 1987. I know he carried that A+ defense rating into the early 1990's, but that doesn't enamor me as much as it might for others. At least not enough to say it would get him into the Hall of Fame.
|
|
ciggy20
College Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,472
|
Post by ciggy20 on Feb 22, 2010 11:27:54 GMT -6
no
|
|
|
Post by scarface132 on May 10, 2010 14:15:41 GMT -6
Right now it is still a no. That might change later.
|
|
|
Post by jlafavor on May 10, 2010 14:39:57 GMT -6
solley, this was 2 years ago, nance didnt get any votes last year and was removed from the ballot.
|
|