|
Post by jlafavor on Feb 20, 2010 16:39:50 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by don1955 on Feb 20, 2010 17:40:41 GMT -6
i vote no as to me he is just about the same player as king, who i also vote no...
|
|
Daboy
1st Rounder
1975 ITP Champs (ITP2), 1987 ITP Champs (ITP3), 1987 GMOTY
Posts: 6,600
|
Post by Daboy on Feb 20, 2010 22:31:18 GMT -6
im going to say yes because he was consistant
|
|
|
Post by joshbounds on Feb 20, 2010 22:43:07 GMT -6
I voted yes, he was an upper level payer throughout his career..
|
|
josh
2nd Rounder
1979 ITP Champs
Posts: 2,730
|
Post by josh on Feb 21, 2010 0:22:31 GMT -6
For me, Aguirre is a no...I know it sounds weird because I'm a yes on King, but here's why.
Aguirre spent most of his career playing on mediocre teams, so his production looks better than it actually is. He was never a proven playoff performer and only made three all-star teams in his career and never won any awards.
To me, King > Aguirre, so I'm surprised at these results.
|
|
|
Post by jlafavor on Feb 21, 2010 0:36:09 GMT -6
i said no on aguirre also, i find it hard to vote for someone who never won a single award. if you dont have a season where you arent a top 3 player at your position or a top 2 defender, my vote will be tough to obtain.
|
|
josh
2nd Rounder
1979 ITP Champs
Posts: 2,730
|
Post by josh on Feb 21, 2010 0:41:04 GMT -6
i said no on aguirre also, i find it hard to vote for someone who never won a single award. if you dont have a season where you arent a top 3 player at your position or a top 2 defender, my vote will be tough to obtain.This, in my opinion, is STELLAR criteria for HOF voting. Couldn't agree more.
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Feb 21, 2010 0:47:22 GMT -6
I voted no as well. And Josh me and you think a like again. I think King was better. King also shot a higher fg% plus I doubt he was high options on some teams where he was putting up 20 a game, unlike Aguirre who was probably a 1 or 2 most of his career.
|
|
|
Post by Keyser Soze on Feb 21, 2010 1:20:49 GMT -6
Good player, not hall of famer.
|
|
|
Post by John1974 on Feb 21, 2010 12:12:02 GMT -6
i vote no as to me he is just about the same player as king, who i also vote no... Agree and if I feel King isnt HOF worthy then I cant vote for Aguirre.
|
|
|
Post by arrestinu on Feb 21, 2010 14:06:53 GMT -6
I'm voting no as well on Aguirre. I think the reasons have been hashed out pretty well already here. He is a very good player, but I don't see anything that makes me want to see him in the Hall of Fame right now.
|
|
|
Post by gritter13 on Feb 21, 2010 14:55:16 GMT -6
I voted no for King, and I'm going no for Aguirre. For me, he was very good, but not great.
|
|
ciggy20
College Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,472
|
Post by ciggy20 on Feb 22, 2010 11:29:10 GMT -6
no
|
|
voker84
College Starter
Posts: 2,401
|
Post by voker84 on Feb 22, 2010 20:39:18 GMT -6
nope
|
|