|
Post by John1974 on Dec 28, 2021 10:07:55 GMT -6
I have let it go for season 1 but
SF John Doe/ John Johnson/ John Johnson
Will not work. You cannot list a player twice at the same position. I have let it go due to roster space in season 1 but starting season 2 this will no longer be allowed.
|
|
|
Post by joecurry2 on Dec 28, 2021 10:16:55 GMT -6
so we no longer have a starter and bench only players to man the bench then
|
|
Penny
College Starter
Posts: 1,910
|
Post by Penny on Dec 28, 2021 15:56:03 GMT -6
John Johnson garbage anyway...
But can we do this still
SG: John Doe/ John Johnson PG: Jane Doe/John Johnson
|
|
|
Post by John1974 on Dec 29, 2021 9:31:40 GMT -6
John Johnson garbage anyway... But can we do this still SG: John Doe/ John Johnson PG: Jane Doe/John Johnson Yes
|
|
Kong
2nd Rounder
Posts: 4,611
|
Post by Kong on Dec 29, 2021 9:51:28 GMT -6
I am ok with this but I feel like it could be better if guys are allowed to play #2 and #3 in rotation if it is just for one position. Or else, you are favoring versatile bench players over specialists or big men that are strictly Centers for instance.
Like I prefer if we would allow
SF John Doe/John Johnson/John Johnson SG John Doe 2/John Doe 3/John Doe 3
and
SF John Doe/John Johnson/John Doe 3 SG John Doe 2/John Johnson/John Doe 3
and not
SF John Doe/John Johnson/John Johnson SG John Doe 2/John Johnson/John Doe 3
to give an example
|
|
|
Post by John1974 on Dec 29, 2021 10:03:02 GMT -6
its ok for current season but starting next year you will need 3 deep at one position.
|
|
|
Post by joecurry2 on Dec 29, 2021 13:07:56 GMT -6
give me an example
because
in the past
we could go
1 - 2 - 1 or 1 - 1 - 2
now it's
1 - 2 - 2
so are you saying it will be
1 - 2 - 3
|
|
|
Post by John1974 on Dec 29, 2021 14:17:57 GMT -6
Look my depth chart
|
|
|
Post by John1974 on Dec 29, 2021 14:18:19 GMT -6
Yes 1, 2, 3.
|
|
|
Post by yourkers15 on Dec 29, 2021 15:38:30 GMT -6
So pretty much if you have a valuable asset he can be your lead off the bench at multiple positions but just can't be listed as duel at the same position and starters can only be starters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2021 15:45:23 GMT -6
Here's an illustration:
PG: A-F-H SG: B-F-H SF: C-F-H PF: D-G-I C: E-G-I
Player F is your backup at 3 spots and H is your 3rd stringer there. Player G is your backup at 2 spots and player I is your 3rd stringer there. So you're forced to have a minimum of 9 guys in your depth chart now. The first 7 will get the vast majority of your minutes though.
|
|
|
Post by John1974 on Dec 29, 2021 17:54:43 GMT -6
Here's an illustration: PG: A-F-H SG: B-F-H SF: C-F-H PF: D-G-I C: E-G-I Player F is your backup at 3 spots and H is your 3rd stringer there. Player G is your backup at 2 spots and player I is your 3rd stringer there. So you're forced to have a minimum of 9 guys in your depth chart now. The first 7 will get the vast majority of your minutes though. Yep
|
|
Kong
2nd Rounder
Posts: 4,611
|
Post by Kong on Dec 29, 2021 20:56:20 GMT -6
but John1974 , what you think of my reasoning for also allowing players to do #2 and #3 if that player only does 1 position? Just checking if you read that part. I mean, if you allow that and someone decides to put a player for #2 and #3, he would actually require more players instead of less because with the way we will do it now you can use 2 players for 3 positions for instance. So in reality rule just makes it better for a certain typo of player that can play multiple positions rather than for teams to need more players. Put that in an example: SF: Player 1/Player 4/Player 5 SG: Player 2/Player 4/Player 5 PG: Player 3/Player 4/Player 5 ^ That requires 5 guys. But if you also allow a player to do #2 and #3 for one position only and someone decides to use that, then you have: SF: Player 1/Player 4/Player 5 SG: Player 2/Player 4/Player 5 PG: Player 3/Player 6/Player 6 ^ That requires 6.
|
|
|
Post by John1974 on Dec 30, 2021 11:18:27 GMT -6
no the rules were meant to be how I asked them to be. Ive let it slide season 1 due to lack of players in a restart.
|
|
|
Post by joecurry2 on Dec 30, 2021 11:23:19 GMT -6
if we had 2 players that can play all positions then it can be 7 then
|
|
|
Post by John1974 on Dec 30, 2021 11:27:51 GMT -6
if we had 2 players that can play all positions then it can be 7 then follow the rules that are listed.
|
|