Grading Articles Changes

[mavsgeniousgm]

You can write 2 per sim day or up to 6 per week. Please number the articles as you post them each week starting with #1. If you hit the 6 limit before the next monday you must wait to post anymore articles. They can be about a player, team, anything league related.

You will get $45.00 - 65.00 cash for any article you write. You can only submit 2 articles per day. Articles will be graded on quality, length, substance.

Suns GM's Grading:

$65: Perfect article. In some way or another benefits every team in the league. It's a solid read, truly a perfect definition of the word "article". Tons of effort has obviously gone into it. Will be hard to acquire.

$55: Very solid article. Perhaps deals with an entire division, or a good portion of the league. Gives a lot of solid input, and a lot of effort obviously gone in. Information beneficial to all those who read.

$45: Very good article, deals with one team, but gives major insight. Non-articles will be included here. Humour-based "writings", or "non-articles" will still earn money. Effort obvious.

$5-20: Copy & Paste articles, IF its a simple copy and paste article without any other content you will be graded on a 5-20.00 scale. If you add more content to it thats clearly not copy $ paste you will be graded higher due to the extra content.

BONUSES: $5 will be randomly tacked on, if you created some solid conversation.

Once your article is graded, make sure you claim in the "League Bank" forum with a link to the graded article.


Notice the minor changes I made? Well lets get the Article writers get more active next upcoming season!

[New York Knicks]

You making up your own rules now douchebag?

[mavsgeniousgm]

I forgot to say what does everyone thing of this possible rule changing? lol How's that DOUCHEBAG!

[jlafavor]

i dont think its a matter of the rate for the articles. we have enough cash out and about that i dont think we need to raise the levels any. we just need less lazy people (myself included)

[Deleted]

I don't think they should be raised necessarily but I do think the range could be a little bigger, that would be better in my opinion.

In my preception the difference between a good and an average article is $1, 25+3 over 25+2, that's lame imo. Effort as well as good stuff should be rewarded more than by just a buck extra.

[mavsgeniousgm]

Oct 5, 2009 17:34:54 GMT -6 @motown said:

I don't think they should be raised necessarily but I do think the range could be a little bigger, that would be better in my opinion.

In my preception the difference between a good and an average article is $1, 25+3 over 25+2, that's lame imo. Effort as well as good stuff should be rewarded more than by just a buck extra.

LOL +1

[arrestinu]

I don't think the article amounts need changed. All I can see that doing is giving more $$$ to the ones who do write articles on a regular basis, not necessarily enticing more GM's to write articles.

I wrote a lot last year, but this year my team has been so crappy, no one would have any interest in it, so I spared everyone the boredom. ;D

Just my .02.