Post by jlafavor on Aug 30, 2009 14:13:19 GMT -6
I have a great idea for new articles, we can do a Man 2 Man (stolen from ESPN Fantasy Football) where two GM's will debate about similar players.
How it could work would be a couple gms decide upon two players they want to do a Man 2 Man about, then one will write up his argument, pm it to the other. Then he will write a rebuttal and post it. for grading i was thinking $25 could be awarded to each participant, and the grader can determine who made a better argument and award the additional $5 to that person.
What does everyone think of this idea? Anyone want to do a debate with me? Mostly i am bored of doing the same old articles and get tired of doing all the research of multiple teams and players, just 2 players would be more fun and i love arguing (in a respectful manner of course.)
How it could work would be a couple gms decide upon two players they want to do a Man 2 Man about, then one will write up his argument, pm it to the other. Then he will write a rebuttal and post it. for grading i was thinking $25 could be awarded to each participant, and the grader can determine who made a better argument and award the additional $5 to that person.
What does everyone think of this idea? Anyone want to do a debate with me? Mostly i am bored of doing the same old articles and get tired of doing all the research of multiple teams and players, just 2 players would be more fun and i love arguing (in a respectful manner of course.)
