|
|
Post by aceman034 on May 31, 2009 13:03:02 GMT -6
That is a good point. It will help the players to get 20% to stay on the ballot....
|
|
|
|
Post by don1955 on May 31, 2009 13:26:20 GMT -6
i dont want the hof filled with 'fringe' players, only the ones who truely deserve it...jmo
|
|
|
|
Post by arrestinu on May 31, 2009 13:40:29 GMT -6
i dont want the hof filled with 'fringe' players, only the ones who truely deserve it...jmo I agree with that. But at the same time, does it make sense that if there are, say, 7 clear cut HOF'ers nominated one season that you should only be able to vote for 3 or 5 of them? If over 66% of the ITP votes a player in, then he really shouldn't be classified as "fringe". I anticipate that just as in real life, there may be a few players who get between 20-65% here that will loiter on the ballot for a few years and then gradually fade away, declining in vote % each year. Some may actually work their way up to 66% over the years, which would make them HOF worthy according to ITP GM's. I'm good either way, I just don't see a need to limit the number of players you can vote for if they are listed on the ballot. Just a newby's opinion. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by don1955 on May 31, 2009 13:56:20 GMT -6
you have a point on if there is say 7 clear hof canidates for 1 year....if there is a limit on the voting list then someone would surely be left out...but then they would surely be voted in next year as their really isnt going to be a max number each year for sure...
as for some that may work their way up to 66% over a few years, those would be the ones that i would worry about being fringe and maybe some gms voting on them for that year as if there are no real choices to pick from, just to cast a vote...
but as you said, i am good either way with 3, 5, or even an open number ballot (an maybe this is the best one)...
and your newbys opinion is just as important as anyones here, hell what do i know about this as it is new to me also... ;D
|
|
